Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06951 12
Original file (06951 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
Pout Or ae

Se Tg

ae é

2 TS

    
     

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

     

   

BUG
Docket No: 6951-12

31 October 2012

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

Tae Secretary of the Navy

ena E a aE

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

DD Form 149 dtd 16 Feb 12 w/attachment

Encl: (1)
(2) HOQMC MMER/PERB ltr dtd 26 Jun 12
(3) HOMC MMER e-mail dtd 2 Aug L2
(4) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 27 Aug 12 w/enclosure
(5) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject

hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the

ember 2010 to 31 May 2011 (copy at Tab

Marine Corps Total Force System

A) and removing, from the
25 August

(MCTFS), the weight control entry for 25 February to
2011 (copy at Tab B). As shown in enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review

Board (PERB) has directed removing the contested report.

 

>. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Midboe and
Silberman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and

injustice on 25 October 2012, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record

pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,

finds as follows:

a. Before applying to the Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law

and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Enclosure (3) reflects the basis for the PERB action.

c. In enclosure (4), the HQMC office with cognizance over
weight control entries commented to the effect that the entry at
issue should be removed.

CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (4), the Board finds an error

and injustice warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION:

 

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing
from the MCTFS data base the weight control entry for 25
February to 25 August 2011.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was

present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

5 fp
PVATRY Ge ‘ (epPanre
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
y set out in Section

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authorit
a for Correction of

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Boar
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))

and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ae

ROBERT D.“~ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11

    Original file (03941-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03944-12

    Original file (03944-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. White-Olson and Messrs. Gattis and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 11 February 9011. c. That any material or entries inconsistent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06893-10

    Original file (06893-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed-enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 5 April to 31 December 2006 (denied on 20 March 2008, docket number 1029-08), 1 January to 31 December 2007, 1 January to 26 May 2008, 27 May to 30 June 2008, 1 July to 26 September 2008, 27 September to 31 December 2008, 1 January to 8 May 2009 and 9 May to 31...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07

    Original file (02803-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12164-08

    Original file (12164-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to.as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 31 May 2005 (copy at Tab A) and modifying his Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data by deleting the weight control entries for 8 February 1997 to 22 March 2000 and 1 March to 25 July 2005 (copy at Tab B).. The Board substantially concurs...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14

    Original file (NR5272 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11

    Original file (06664-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09788-09

    Original file (09788-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In enclosure (3), MMOA-4, the HOMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section, commented to the effect that Petitioner's failures of selection to lieutenant colonel should not be removed, notwithstanding the PERB action, in view of the noncompetitive cumulative relative values in his fitness reports as a major, as well as a fitness report date gap. Notwithstanding enclosure (3), the Board finds Petitioner’s failures of selection to lieutenant colonel should be removed as well. b, That his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09

    Original file (02283-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02280 12

    Original file (02280 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2009, a copy of which is at Tab A. That his record be corrected further to restore his AMOS of 8411. c. That his record be corrected further to show his entitlement to SDA pay for 21 July 2010 to 13 June...